AI-trace-sot
📌 Summary of the Post
Langchain CEO Harrison Chase Post on In software, the code documents the app. In AI, the traces do.
The core idea of this post is a fundamental shift in how we understand and reason about software systems:
In traditional software development, understanding a system means reading the source code. The logic, control flow, and behavior are explicitly defined in files and functions.
In modern AI-powered systems, especially AI agents (LLMs combined with tools, memory, and reasoning), behavior is no longer fully encoded in static code.
Instead, the system’s true logic emerges at runtime, through prompts, model reasoning, tool calls, intermediate states, and outputs.
As a result, execution traces — records of what actually happened during a run — become the true documentation of system behavior and decision-making.
🔍 Key Takeaways
✔️ Shift in the Source of Truth
Traditional applications: → Code documents behavior
AI systems: → Traces document behavior and reasoning
✔️ Why This Matters
AI decisions are made inside models at runtime, not fully determined by scaffold code.
Without traces, it is impossible to reliably answer why an AI agent took a specific action.
For debugging, auditing, monitoring, and improvement, traces replace static code as the most trustworthy evidence of system logic.
✔️ Implications for AI Engineering
Observability and trace storage become foundational infrastructure, not optional tooling.
Developers must design systems to capture, store, and visualize traces of agent behavior.
Testing and optimization must evolve from code-level validation to trace-level analysis of real executions.
🧠 Commentary: Why This Insight Is Important
Harrison Chase’s post highlights a quiet but profound transition in software engineering:
In traditional software, the code documents the app. In AI systems, especially agents, the traces do.
As AI agents increasingly rely on LLM reasoning, the “logic” of the system no longer lives entirely in source code. Code increasingly acts as scaffolding — a framework that enables behavior — while the actual decisions emerge dynamically at runtime.
This reframes how we should build, debug, and trust AI systems:
Code alone is insufficient to explain behavior
Tracing and observability become first-class engineering concerns
Understanding “what the AI did” and “why it did it” requires examining what actually happened, not what was intended in code
This is why tooling for tracing, agent logs, replay, and behavior inspection (e.g., LangSmith-style systems) is foundational, not optional, for production AI.
In short: ➡️ AI engineering is shifting from reading code to reading behavior.
Last updated
Was this helpful?